Posted Jun 16, 2009 at 08:08PM by Mabie A. Listed in: World of Warcraft, EverQuest 2, EverQuest, News Tags: Blizzard, Sony, BlizzCon
Ó

EverQuest - Image 1Sony is taking credit for the existence of the hottest MMORPG around, World of Warcraft, saying that had it not been for their Everquest, WoW would not have existed to wow the gaming world as it does today. Lead designer Ryan Barker shares some choice words on the matter.

"That's definitely true," he said when asked if he agreed with the contention that WoW would not have existed it EverQuest was not released.

And I think most of the guys at Blizzard would say that too. They had a comment at BlizzCon where somebody mentioned EverQuest and a few people in the crowd booed. I don't remember who was up there at that time, but they were like, hey you can't be knocking on the grandfathers there. I think that's definitely true.


Of course, EverQuest has proven itself to be a game to be reckoned with on its own as well, being the game to have no less than 15 expansions, and a number of spin-offs too since its 1999 release.

Did the team ever thought that it could have been them enjoying the success that the 2004-launched WoW is enjoying?

Yes and no. We definitely had our day. EverQuest was top of the heap for years and years and years. Yest that's true to an extent, but it's so easy to look back with hindsight and see what we could have done along the way. We took some gambles with some games. Some of them played out, some of them didn't, and here we are.


But I think we're till looking forward and we're trying to make the next big game after Warcraft, and hopefully we will do tat. But when you see those giant numbers, it's hard not to be a little bit!




Related Articles:


[Via Videogamer] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

2 Comments


Sort by:
   by Advertising -
   by symbyosis - 2009-06-18
 » slight problem with EQ/WoW

they might be fun like people say, but I refuse to pay to play something I paid for. If I should pay to play, the game should be downloaded 100% free. (this is my perspective on it obviously). I just feel if I paid 50 bucks for a game I will probably play maybe 2 hours a week at most, I shouldn't pay 10-15 bucks a month aside from my already high internet bill to play it. Also...yeah I already knew EQ was before WoW :P but I prefer WC3/Diablo2 over both, cause the online is FREE.


   Re: jspliff - 2009-06-28
 » ...

I partially agree that the game should be free. But that will never happen. Not when soo many people are willing to pay for both the game and the monthly fee. And then the expansions after that. In all honesty though, if the monthly fee is that big an issue, google for private servers. They exist all over the place. I played UO for 7 years on a private server before wow came out.


Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!